Pathologized Totalitarianism 101

So, GloboCap has crossed the Rubicon. The final phase of its transformation of society into a pathologized-totalitarian dystopia, where mandatory genetic-therapy injections and digital compliance papers are commonplace, is now officially underway.

On November 19, 2021, the government of New Normal Austria decreed that, as of February, experimental mRNA injections will be mandatory for the entire population. This decree comes in the midst of Austria’s official persecution of “the Unvaccinated,” i.e., political dissidents and other persons of conscience who refuse to convert to the new official ideology and submit to a series of mRNA injections, purportedly to combat a virus that causes mild-to-moderate flu-like symptoms (or no symptoms of any kind at all) in about 95% of the infected and the overall infection fatality rate of which is approximately 0.1% to 0.5%.

Austria is just the tip of the New Normal spear. Prominent New-Normal fascists in Germany, like Der Führer of Bavaria, Markus Söder, and Minister of Propaganda Karl Lauterbach, are already calling for an allgemeine Impfpflicht (i.e., “compulsory vaccination requirement”), which should not come as a surprise to anyone. The Germans are not going sit idly by and let the Austrians publicly out-fascist them, are they? They have a reputation to uphold, after all! Italy will probably be next to join in, unless Lithuania or Australia beats them to the punch.

But, seriously, this is just the beginning of the Winter Siege I wrote about recently. The plan seems to be to New-Normalize Europe first — generally speaking, Europeans are more docile, respectful of all authority, and not very well armed — and then use it as leverage to force the new pathologized totalitarianism on the USA, and the UK, and the rest of the world.

I do not believe this plan will succeed. Despite the most intensive propaganda campaign in the history of propaganda campaigns, there remain enough of us who steadfastly refuse to accept the “New Normal” as our new reality.

And a lot of us are angry, extremely angry … militantly, explosively angry.

We are not “vaccine hesitant” or “anti-vax” or “Covid-denying conspiracy theorists.” We are millions of regular working-class people, people with principles, who value freedom, who are not prepared to go gently into the globalized, pathologized-totalitarian night. We no longer give the slightest shit whether our former friends and family members who have gone New Normal understand what this is. We do. We understand exactly what this is. It is a nascent form of totalitarianism, and we intend to kill it — or at least critically wound it — before it matures into a full-grown behemoth.

Now, I want to be absolutely clear. I am not advocating or condoning violence. But it is going to happen. It is happening already. Totalitarianism (even this “pathologized” version of it) is imposed on society and maintained with violence. Fighting totalitarianism inevitably entails violence. It is not my preferred tactic in the current circumstances, but it is unavoidable now that we’ve reached this stage, and it is important that those of us fighting this fight recognize that violence is a natural response to the violence (and the implicit threat of violence) that is being deployed against us by the New Normal authorities, and the masses they have whipped up into a fanatical frenzy.

It is also important (essential, I would argue) to make the violence of the New Normal visible, i.e., to frame this fight in political terms, and not in the pseudo-medical terms propagated by the official Covid narrative). This isn’t an academic argument over the existence, severity, or the response to a virus. This is a fight to determine the future of our societies.

This fact, above all, is what the global-capitalist ruling classes are determined to conceal. The roll-out of the New Normal will fail if it is perceived as political (i.e., a form of totalitarianism). It relies on our inability to see it as what it is. So it hides itself and the violence it perpetrates within a pseudo-medical official narrative, rendering itself immune to political opposition.

We need to deny it this perceptual redoubt, this hermeneutic hiding place. We need to make it show itself as what it is, a “pathologized” form of totalitarianism. In order to do that, we need to understand it … its internal logic, and its strengths, and weaknesses.

Pathologized Totalitarianism

I have been describing the New Normal as “pathologized totalitarianism” and predicting that compulsory “vaccination” was coming since at least as early as May 2020. (See, e.g., The New Pathologized Totalitarianism). I use the term “totalitarianism” intentionally, not for effect, but for the sake of accuracy. The New Normal is still a nascent totalitarianism, but its essence is unmistakably evident. I described that essence in a recent column:

“The essence of totalitarianism — regardless of which costumes and ideology it wears — is a desire to completely control society, every aspect of society, every individual behavior and thought. Every totalitarian system, whether an entire nation, a tiny cult, or any other form of social body, evolves toward this unachievable goal … the total ideological transformation and control of every single element of society … This fanatical pursuit of total control, absolute ideological uniformity, and the elimination of all dissent, is what makes totalitarianism totalitarianism.”

In October 2020, I published The Covidian Cult, which has since grown into a series of essays examining New-Normal (i.e., pathologized) totalitarianism as “a cult writ large, on a societal scale.” This analogy holds true for all forms of totalitarianism, but especially for New Normal totalitarianism, as it is the first global form of totalitarianism in history, and thus:

“The cult/culture paradigm has been inverted. Instead of the cult existing as an island within the dominant culture, the cult has become the dominant culture, and those of us who have not joined the cult have become the isolated islands within it.”

In The Covidian Cult (Part III), I noted:

“In order to oppose this new form of totalitarianism, we need to understand how it both resembles and differs from earlier totalitarian systems. The similarities are fairly obvious — i.e., the suspension of constitutional rights, governments ruling by decree, official propaganda, public loyalty rituals, the outlawing of political opposition, censorship, social segregation, goon squads terrorizing the public, and so on — but the differences are not as obvious.

And I described how New Normal totalitarianism fundamentally differs from 20th-Century totalitarianism in terms of its ideology, or seeming lack thereof.

“Whereas 20th-Century totalitarianism was more or less national and overtly political, New Normal totalitarianism is supranational, and its ideology is much more subtle. The New Normal is not Nazism or Stalinism. It’s global-capitalist totalitarianism, and global capitalism doesn’t have an ideology, technically, or, rather, its ideology is ‘reality’.”

But the most significant difference between 20th-Century totalitarianism and this nascent, global totalitarianism is how New Normal totalitarianism “pathologizes” its political nature, effectively rendering itself invisible, and thus immune to political opposition. Whereas 20th-Century totalitarianism wore its politics on its sleeve, New Normal totalitarianism presents itself as a non-ideological (i.e., supra-political) reaction to a global public health emergency.

And, thus, its classic totalitarian features — e.g., the revocation of basic rights and freedoms, centralization of power, rule by decree, oppressive policing of the population, demonization and persecution of a “scapegoat” underclass, censorship, propaganda, etc. — are not hidden, because they are impossible to hide, but are recontextualized in a pathologized official narrative.

The Untermenschen become “the Unvaccinated.” Swastika lapel pins become medical-looking masks. Aryan ID papers become “vaccination passes.” Irrefutably senseless social restrictions and mandatory public-obedience rituals become “lockdowns,” “social distancing,” and so on. The world is united in a Goebbelsian total war, not against an external enemy (i.e., a racial or political enemy), but against an internal, pathological enemy.

This pathologized official narrative is more powerful (and insidious) than any ideology, as it functions, not as a belief system or ethos, but rather, as objective “reality.” You cannot argue with or oppose “reality.” “Reality” has no political opponents. Those who challenge “reality” are “insane,” i.e., “conspiracy theorists,” “anti-vaxxers,” “Covid deniers,” “extremists,” etc. And, thus, the pathologized New Normal narrative also pathologizes its political opponents, simultaneously stripping us of political legitimacy and projecting its own violence onto us.

20th-Century totalitarianism also blamed its violence on its scapegoats (i.e., Jews, socialists, counter-revolutionaries, etc.) but it did not attempt to erase its violence. On the contrary, it displayed it openly, in order to terrorize the masses. New Normal totalitarianism cannot do this. It can’t go openly totalitarian, because capitalism and totalitarianism are ideologically contradictory.

Global-capitalist ideology will not function as an official ideology in an openly totalitarian society. It requires the simulation of “democracy,” or at least a simulation of market-based “freedom.” A society can be intensely authoritarian, but, to function in the global-capitalist system, it must allow its people the basic “freedom” that capitalism offers to all consumers, the right/obligation to participate in the market, to own and exchange commodities, etc.

This “freedom” can be conditional or extremely restricted, but it must exist to some degree. Saudi Arabia and China are two examples of openly authoritarian GloboCap societies that are nevertheless not entirely totalitarian, because they can’t be and remain a part of the system. Their advertised official ideologies (i.e., Islamic fundamentalism and communism) basically function as superficial overlays on the fundamental global-capitalist ideology which dictates the “reality” in which everyone lives. These “overlay” ideologies are not fake, but when they come into conflict with global-capitalist ideology, guess which ideology wins.

The point is, New Normal totalitarianism — and any global-capitalist form of totalitarianism — cannot display itself as totalitarianism, or even authoritarianism. It cannot acknowledge its political nature. In order to exist, it must not exist. Above all, it must erase its violence (the violence that all politics ultimately comes down to) and appear to us as an essentially beneficent response to a legitimate “global health crisis” (and a “climate change crisis,” and a “racism crisis,” and whatever other “global crises” GloboCap thinks will terrorize the masses into a mindless, order-following hysteria).

This pathologization of totalitarianism — and the political/ideological conflict we have been engaged in for the past 20 months — is the most significant difference between New Normal totalitarianism and 20th-Century totalitarianism. The entire global-capitalist apparatus (i.e., corporations, governments, supranational entities, the corporate and state media, academia, etc.) has been put into service to achieve this objective.

We need to come to terms with this fact. We do. Not the New Normals. Us.

GloboCap is on the verge of remaking society into a smiley-happy pathologized-totalitarian dystopia where they can mandate experimental genetic “therapies,” and any other type of “therapies” they want, and force us to show our “compliance papers” to go about the most basic aspects of life. This remaking of society is violent. It is being carried out by force, with violence and the ever-present threat of violence. We need to face that, and act accordingly.

Here in New Normal Germany, if you try to go grocery shopping without a medical-looking mask, armed police will remove you from the premises (and I am saying this from personal experience). In New Normal Australia, if you go to synagogue, the media will be alerted and the police will surround you. In Germany, Australia, France, Italy, The Netherlands, Belgium, and many other countries, if you exercise your right to assemble and protest, the police will hose you down with water cannons, shoot you with rubber bullets (and sometimes real bullets), spray toxic agents into your eyes, and just generally beat the crap out of you.

And so on. Those of us fighting for our rights and opposing this pathologized totalitarianism are all-too familiar with the reality of its violence, and the hatred it has fomented in the New Normal masses. We experience it on a daily basis. We feel it every time we’re forced to wear a mask, when some official (or waiter) demands to see our “papers.” We feel it when when we are threatened by our government, when we are gaslighted and demonized by the media, by doctors, celebrities, random strangers, and by our colleagues, friends, and family members.

We recognize the look in their eyes. We remember where it comes from, and what it leads to.

It isn’t just ignorance, mass hysteria, confusion, or an overreaction, or fear … or, OK, yes, it is all those things, but it’s also textbook totalitarianism (notwithstanding the new pathologized twist). Totalitarianism 101.

Look it in the eye, and act accordingly.


CJ Hopkins
November 22, 2021
Photos: (1) Triumph of the Will, 1935; (2) Keith Olbermann/Twitter

DISCLAIMER: The preceding essay is entirely the work of our in-house satirist and self-appointed political pundit, CJ Hopkins, and does not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of the Consent Factory, Inc., its staff, or any of its agents, subsidiaries, or assigns. If, for whatever inexplicable reason, you appreciate Mr. Hopkins’ work and would like to support it, please go to his Substack page, or his Patreon page, or send your contribution to his PayPal account, so that maybe he’ll stop coming around our offices trying to hit our staff up for money. Alternatively, you could purchase his satirical dystopian sci-fi novel, Zone 23, or Volume I and II of his Consent Factory Essays, or any of his subversive stage plays, which won some awards in Great Britain and Australia. If you do not appreciate Mr. Hopkins’ work and would like to write him an abusive email, feel free to contact him directly.

44 thoughts on “Pathologized Totalitarianism 101

  1. Really amazing. Someone comes up with all the vocabulary and ideas that so accurately describe what’s going on today. A firm place to start from when we go talk to others. We owe CJ Hopkins a big thanks.

    Liked by 3 people

  2. I think a core ingredient, which explains, why so many are absorbed into this is missing.


    One has managed to blame people for their mere existence. For breathing. For eating. For being social. For their need of warmth. Guilt, which is unbearable, creates either obedience or denial but no truth. This guilt has been produced over the course of many months now and produces horrors like here:

    The same kind of guilt shows up everywhere and produces a strange distorted reality view everywhere which actively prevents solutions because this would require truth. From what i know, its the kind of guilt which is used in cults.

    Funny is, that guilt can be guided well and used to get people to commit crimes they really should be ashamed of. Its like people can be programmed around the variants of guilt and to a much lesser degree, fear.


  3. Whether it be an individual person, a group of people, a community or a whole society, it’s true that violence is not justifiable unless it is first used by an aggressor against that person, group, community or the whole society (or even upon civilization itself). Then, on the basis of self-defense, it is justified. Indeed, unless there is some reason for restraint (for example, to respond at a later time from a more advantageous position), it is obligatory unless any vestige of individual self-respect is to be maintained.

    New Normal society is characterized by state-sanctioned violence or the threat of violence, as should be clear to anyone who has kept themselves informed as to what has been happening since March 2020. Coercion is as bad as a threat of violence. When a man can feed his family members and keep a roof over their heads, and he can do that only by being paid to work, and he is confronted by the choice of being injected with a potentially deadly so-called “vaccine” or with being prevented from working (resulting in probable homelessness and starvation for his family), and he does not wish to comply, then that is a form of coercion comparable to having a gun put to his head to force him to act contrary to what he knows in his soul that he should do.

    So in the present situation of the so-called “pandemic” serving as a cover for an attempt to bring about a global totalitarianism (as CJ Hopkins so accurately and eloquently describes) there are obviously grounds for replying to violence with violence (where feasible). However, some might prefer to oppose tyranny and coercion by non-violent means. Helpful advice might possibly be found in a book published in 1993, “Strategic Nonviolent Conflict: The Dynamics of People Power in the Twentieth Century”, by Peter Ackerman and Christopher Kruegler. A reviewer notes that “The authors examine six historical episodes of nonviolent resistance undertaken by populations that lacked access to effective military power.”
    It makes for interesting reading. Whether it offers realistic options in the present situation is unclear. It might be better to look at the tactics of the French and German resistance to the Nazi regime from 1933 to 1945. Unfortunately the defeat (by superior military means) of the 12-year “Reich” led to the rise of a new imperialist regime, emerging in 1945, which is only now collapsing, chaotically and probably according to plan, with consequences no-one can predict, but it looks like hard times are coming.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Coercion of people to be “vaccinated” using an “experimental” genetic technology is widespread and does not just consist of the threat of being fired from one’s job, thus losing one’s livelihood. I personally know of three cases: (1) Someone who runs a chemical supply company cannot in practice supervise his employees and run his business without getting the jabs. (2) A retiree cannot attend seminars at a university near where he lives without getting the jabs. (3) A graduate student was granted a PhD scholarship but it was conditional on his getting the jabs. In two cases the persons involved suffered severe health consequences within days or weeks, and in one case the person can now barely function.

      Believe it or not, but a covert war is being waged (and has been for 21 months) by governments and “health authorities” on the populations of all Western countries. People who do not understand this are, by their compliance with tyrannical directives, complicit in an attempt at a global genocide. People who do understand this can choose either to remain complicit or to resist and to fight back as best they can. If enough people fight back, and these war criminal are exposed, then we might be fortunate enough to witness within a year or two the Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal 2.0, and to see those who have initiated, directed and carried out this war upon us receive what they deserve.

      Liked by 1 person

  4. After mandatory vaccination is implemented, and it will became a regular thing (at each 6 months or at least yearly), it will be very easy for a government to kill its opponents. It can provide a special poisonous „vaccine” for those people it want to kill, and it will be covered by the millions of people vaccinated who survived.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. The “only” choice is noncompliance; you MUST fight back. Totalitarianism is being disguised under the pretext of “good public health.” On the surface it appears apolitical, however, loyalty is demonstrated by unquestioning obedience to every irrational Covidien protocol. This sinister psyops was first designed by the “Rockefeller ghoul Foundation,” a precursor to the Gate’s GAVI Goblin/WEF capitalist philanthropic enterprise.

    Rockefeller’s 2010 Lockstep document clearly describes how “public health” will be used “against” the public: “In 2010, the globalist Rockefeller Foundation praises Communist China for their authoritarian actions, remember, this was a future scenario, not reality. However, this is exactly what happened in China! They were indeed the first to lock down their nation, and the rest of the world followed suit.

    The Rockefeller Foundation explains Communism as protecting the people. Of course, this is always how globalists spin their propaganda, “it’s for the good of the people”. In reality, our freedoms are removed for the good of global government, not for the people.

    As cited in the 2010 document: “During the pandemic, national leaders around the world flexed their authority and imposed airtight rules and restrictions, from the mandatory wearing of face masks to body-temperature checks at the entries to communal spaces like train stations and supermarkets…….

    If it is hard for you to differentiate this future scenario from reality, you are not alone. Their future scenario is our reality, just look at what is happening right now.

    Even after the pandemic faded, this more authoritarian control and oversight of citizens and their activities stuck and even intensified.”

    Don’t bother wasting energy on thinking about all the “illogical scientific missteps” and contradictions, COVID is NOT about science it’s about restructuring our way of life so that Western societies replicate China’s technocratic AI surveillance state. Liberal democracies are messy and difficult to control. International financiers, WEF, Wall Street, etc…. know neo-liberalism is “not” sustainable without deploying authoritarianism. COVID passports and all the subsequent booster jabs is little more than a digital tagging system tying personal and financial data into a centralized bank generating a citizen’s score card placing each person on a “very short fascist leash” denying access to personal funds whenever AI surveillance algorithms sense actions interpreted as disloyal. Who can even imagine what sacrifices or flaming hoops each person will need to jump through in order to satisfy the future Covidien Gods.

    By the way, even if you’re considered loyal what does it mean– being impaled to an oculus viewing sicko Metaverse fantasies while intravenously fed toxins described as nourishment–a UBI pathway to a synthetic “not-so-free” lunch…………..

    2010 Rockefeller “Lock Step” Document Coming To Life Right Now. Time To Wake Up.

    2010 Rockefeller “Lock Step” Document Coming To Life Right Now. Time To …
    This post is a sequel to the viral post I did last month at nearly 1 million views and even shared by Mr. David …

    Liked by 1 person

  6. What we are seeing is bolshevism which ended up murdering up to 60 million people in Russia during the first half of the 20th century but hey, do the typical ignorant thing and try and bring up the big bad “nazis” (the people that have been lied about the most in modern human history) and show you have zero understanding of history…or you do have an understanding but are simply a judas goat trying to gaslight everyone so they don’t fully understand what is going on and will keep yammering on about the “nazis”

    Liked by 2 people

  7. I see you are quoted and referenced in RFK Jr’s new book on fauci – CONGRATS!! You are more widely read and respected than you probably realize, and those of us who have been lucky enough to have found you years ago are more than thrilled to see your wisdom shared further. Thanks again for sharing your brilliance!

    Keep the faith, Brother, in spirit and arms if necessary. We will win in the end, that I am sure!
    May God Bless you, soon and always!

    Liked by 3 people

  8. You haven’t zoomed way out in order to see the true Big Picture in which this stuff is just a component? Gee, I got some BAD news for you guys.

    Joe Biden gave a speech before Congress, in which he advocated for a “new world order”, one that would have nations surrendering sovereignty in favor of global governance by the U.N. Most people are likely unaware of this, but it’s in the Congressional Record for anyone to confirm on their own. It took place in June, 1992 which was the same month that the U.N. unveiled their Agenda 21 plan for the whole world and agreed to by 178 nations at the time. A few years later, Bill Clinton as president created a federal dept. for “sustainable development” (code words for the Agenda) which has been saturating the entire governmental bureaucracy with Agenda and it’s elements, reaching down through the states, counties and, ultimately the plan is to be implemented locally. It’s not done in the name of Agenda 21. It’s: sustainable, resilient, robust, inclusive, smart, equity, justice, etc. And there are swarms of NGOs and CBOs and nonprofits all blessed by the U.N.

    At the turn of this year, the World Economic Forum announced that it is partnering with the U.N. for implementing the Agenda. You’re aware of their plan for The Great Reset? Take a look on their website where they have a list of who their partners are.

    “Effective execution of Agenda 21 will require a profound reorientation of all human society, unlike anything the world has ever experienced a major shift in the priorities of both governments and individuals and an unprecedented redeployment of human and financial resources. This shift will demand that a concern for the consequences of every human action be integrated into individual and collective decision-making at every level.”
    – UN Agenda 21


  9. […] You are right, we cannot trust them in the number of “cases” now, anymore than at the beginning. That said, many countries are actually starting to make vaccines completely mandatory, on pain of huge fines and prison. Austria is the first. It won’t be the only one. Others in Europe will follow, and perhaps later Canada. I find it incredible that governments can now force the experimental product of big corporations on everyone, and very few people say anything. There are some protests, sure, but they seem to have little to no effect. The authorities keep blaming the “unvaccinated” with little evidence that the vaccine itself does much to stop the disease. They will make it mandatory for children, who are immune, too. See here. […]


  10. Thank you, CJ Hopkins for explaining the situation we are in so well. The ‘covidian cult’ analysis is so well articulated. It has helped me understand why presenting facts to these people does not work. It’s their new ‘religion’,,,”faith’ and ‘reality’. It is refreshing to hear from a leftist/liberal who is awake to what is really going on, my hats off to you. Most leftist/liberals I know are completely brainwashed by the ‘official narrative’. For many years vaccines have been a ‘religion ‘ or ‘cult , the ‘vaccine cult’, This is a supra-expansion of that ideology.


  11. And now The News.

    So – – –

    The new coronavirus strain, now detected in South Africa and known as B.1.1529, comes with a disconcertingly high number of mutations and thus is very different from previous incarnations, to drive further waves of disease by evading the body’s none too brilliant defenses, courtesy of vaccines with less than a glamorous half life.

    As vaccine geneticists have helpfully pointed out, seemingly years ago, vaccinating during a pandemic and with vaccines with short term effects provide an excellent environment for these critters to mutate into something more effective, read dangerous.

    With so many people now living on the streets and filling the gaols in countries where an interest in basic prison and homelessness hygiene would be thought novel, we have the incubator for this next dangerous pathogenic wave and a few more beyond this one.

    Perhaps a cross between CoVid and resistant TB to look forward to? Both lung diseases.

    Anyhow, this is what Western Governments, Central Bankers, Major Thinktankers and the generally self-appointed, self-annointed Ruling Class need for them to assert their control of circumstances as they collectively have little in the way of leadership, imagination and any of that illusive “Vision Thing” that we all desperately need but no-one knows any more just what it might look like, as least in The West.

    The East, on the other hand, is full steam ahead as we remain stalled at the lights.

    Thus Spake I . . .

    Liked by 1 person

  12. The word “tyranny” has a long history. First recorded in 1325–75; Middle English “tyrannie”, from Old French, from Medieval Latin “tyrannia”, equivalent to Latin “tyrann(us)”, “oppressive ruler”. Tyranny is now being re-imposed upon us by covert powers in the West and spreading rapidly around the world (thus “global tyranny”). It masquerades as “authority”, especially “medical authority” and “the authority of ‘the science'” (or rather, pseudo-science), and its aim is total control (which is why it is called “totalitarianism”).

    Tyranny can only be successful if all (or almost all) adults (those who are not just overgrown dumbed-down adolescent) succumb to cleverly developed subliminal mechanisms of mind control (delivered mainly through television), and as a result abandon their innate autonomy, integrity and dignity, and submit to externally imposed power — generally the power of the state, which is enforced by the threat of violence and backed up by frequent public displays of violence (intended to reduce everyone to fearful cowards).

    Defeat of the developing global tyranny will occur only if enough people (mainly in Western societies) wake up from the belief that they will be saved by something external to themselves (such as political elections of so-called “leaders”) and manifest the courage to defy “authority” and go their own way, guided by an innate sense of what is right, even if this involves some degree of risk or even injury.

    For inspiration listen to Terence McKenna in After Skool’s “Reject Authority, Trust Yourself” at


  13. CJ Hopkins has done fine work over the past two years in exposing the evil intent of the proponents of “Agenda 21” and their minions in the U.S. CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention — headed by Dr. Rochelle Walensky), NIH (National Institutes of Health — headed by Dr. Francis Collins), NIAID (National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases — headed by Dr. Anthony Fauci), EcoHealth Alliance (headed by Peter Daszak) and the leaders of the national health departments in many (mainly Western) countries.

    Outrage is the appropriate response to reading CJ Hopkins — outrage at the lies, deception and arrogant tyranny of officials (and many non-officials) whose actions over the last two years have resulted in physical and mental devastation, impoverishment and death to millions of people, and which portend global genocide if not stopped.

    But that deception and tyranny is unlikely to be stopped simply by widespread, or even general, popular outrage. It would be stopped by global nuclear war devastating whole countries, but as a result most of us would die from the direct and indirect effects. But that solution can be avoided if the plans of Walensky, Collins, Fauci ,Daszak and their like can be defeated by non-violent, legal means. This is both possible and feasible. The way has been shown by Dr. Francis Boyle, a professor of international law at the University of Illinois College of Law, and author of the book, “Biowarfare and Terrorism.” It is explained in detail in Dr. Joseph Mercola’s “Roadmap for Prosecuting COVID Crimes”, in which we read:

    “The problem we face today is that our federal government has been captured by forces that seek to destroy the U.S. from within. As such, we cannot trust the federal judiciary to prosecute and hold those responsible for the pandemic and the toxic COVID shots accountable. To circumvent the corrupted federal judiciary, we need to focus on locally elected prosecutors instead. Depending on the state, they may go by titles such as district attorney, state attorney, prosecuting attorney or county attorney. Organize locally to find people willing, as a group, to call on your local, elected district attorney to convene a grand jury and indict the individuals suspected of being involved in the creation of SARS-CoV-2, and those responsible for the COVID shots. The charge that applies is ‘murder and conspiracy to commit murder.'”

    According to official reports, over half of the world’s population has now received at least one injection of the so-called and misnamed COVID “vaccination”. Almost the only way to prevent the other half (including about two billion children) from suffering infertility, injury and death is through the actions of U.S. citizens using grand juries to bring criminal indictments against those responsible for this horrendous crime against humanity, in this case the heads of the “health authorities” named above and the heads of the pharmaceutical companies (Pfizer, etc.) that developed, manufactured, promoted and sold the so-called “vaccinations” for their personal financial enrichment and for the callous implementation of an irreversible global tyranny.


    1. However bad the “vaccine” is (and it is horrible), the issue is far bigger, as Mr. Hopkins has made clear for a year and a half now. The only way to overcome this public health tyranny and have any hope of preventing a recurrence is to eliminate the entire concept of “public health” which is so easily used to manipulate otherwise decent people. Even if the vaccine manufacturers are successfully prosecuted, if the “health departments” are left intact, they will treat this as only a speed bump and sell it as an “unfortunate error” due to the “dire emergency” of the pandemic.

      As soon as the lockdowns began in March 2020, long before anyone was talking about vaccines as a real possibility, I and many others sensed that we had lost our freedom and didn’t know how to start getting it back. Let’s not focus exclusively on the vaccine as the only problem.

      Liked by 1 person

  14. “On November 19, 2021, the government of New Normal Austria decreed that, as of February, experimental mRNA injections will be mandatory for the entire population. This decree comes in the midst of Austria’s official persecution of “the Unvaccinated,””

    In my opinion this could also be a mere PsyOp. Despite Chancellor Schallenberg seems to have developed delusions to be a kind of absolutistic souvereign, there would be enormous constitutional and judical obstacles in his way. The Austrian MSM and the German MSM, too have virtually raided the people with PsyOp messages as “Mandatory vaccination will come frontally!”, “Mass vaccination unavoidable according to Chancelor Schallenberg!” “Schallenberg wants mandatory vaccination at the latest in February 2022!”. In Germany the MSM have started the same PsyOp campaign.

    As a result of those PsyOps the number of hitherto steadfast “unvaccinated” underwent a sudden and dramatic change. The numbers of persons who got their 1st shot began to increase dramatically just a few days after these MSM reports. I have been observing the numbers of daily 1st shots in Austria and Germany since these PsyOps began. It seems that now thousands are running like madmen to their doctors or vaccination centers to get jabbed.
    Despite I’m aware that globocap has now entered a new stage of terror against the people of the world, globocap still cannot entirely ignore or uverun existant democratic structures which are implemented in constitutional and civil law, so they still have to operate within still existing democratic structures.

    Moreover forced or even violently performed vaccinations would be a quite different thing as “deliberate” vaccinations. In the case of forced vaccinations doctors, police officers, frontline workers and last but not least politicians, too would be legally liable in case of severe adverse vaccination effects which they would definitely NOT be in the case of “deliberate” vaccinations.. Not the manufacturers, they were extremely crafty and made toggle contracts which exempt them from any legal liability.

    The thing is very easy: Forced vaccination = legal liability….”Deliberate” vaccination = NO legal lability.

    Alexander Schallenberg, Olaf Scholz and all those other fascist jerks just throw with burning confetti to scare the sheep herd into the vaccinations centers to “deliberately” get jabbed. The aim is to generate masses of “deliberately” jabbed people because only “deliberately” jabbed people are people that can’t sue those basterds in case of severe adverse effects.

    In any case, I will not fall for these PsyOps and get panicked that the cops will pick me up to be forcibly vaccinated. Good advice to all Germans and Austrians who have so far stood up boldly to the vaccination terror and have not been vaccinated…. Paper tigers only throw crackers and burning confetti. Don’t let these assholes fool you.


    1. I actually agree with you. But it is quite scary how far “they” (the controlling component in the background) have gone/gotten this time. I think it is now past the point where it could be corrected.

      I recommend taking another look at the coverage of sars / swine flu 2009. In Germany, all the big private media were already fantasising about mountains of corpses and Armageddon … only the public broadcasters had forgotten about it? And there is even a video on youtube of the “Harald Schmidt Show” where he makes a parody out of it (from the “pandemic”) with Böhmermann in his younger years and invents an “infected” person. Where Böhmermann wrote to the larger media/news programmes and told them as Mr. Alt how he suffers and is discriminated against as an “infected person” in this pandemic. Of course, one day later, they greedily came to soak up an interview, which they then brought as the second contribution to the main programme one day later.
      ARTE also has a swine flu video from 2009 … when Dorsten was still fresh and Wodarg was still in office in the SPD. It is remarkable how the positions have shifted over time.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Indeed the perfection of this ‘choreography’ or “orchestration” is scary. Lockstep-scenario? I think it is exactly that. Maybe SARS-CoV 1 and H5N1 were just kinda rehearsals. The “orchestration” had not been sublime enough then. Maybe nCoV-2019 just was more “suitable” due to it’s higher transmission rate. Another reason could be that in the case of SARS-CoV 1 vaccinologists already started to design possible vaccine platforms against coronaviruses which could then be applied for nCoV-2019. What I have never understood is why SARS-CoV 1 and MERS-CoV virtually “died out” or completely vanished. The explanations “experts” for that strange phenomenon of viruses all of asudden vanishing into thin air (SARS 1, MERS – Have you seen these viruses?) are not satisfactory in my opinion. It’s said that SARS 1 and MERS “vanished” coz they were “less transmissible”. “Less transmissible” is bollocks and contradicts what was said by “experts” in 2003 and 2012, They spoke of “higly transmissible”, “most dangerous” and “strongly mutating” viruses. The ‘disappearence’ of SARS 1 and MERS is an enigma.


  15. There’s a lot of talk about “mandatory” vaccinations for residents of Austria, Greece and Germany. When one looks up a dictionary definition of “mandatory” they mostly say, “Required or commanded by authority; obligatory.” This is quite vague. Commanded by whom or what? Is failure to comply with a “mandate” a criminal act? A misdemeanor? A felony? According to the law of which country? Or is it a “directive”? if so, what is the penalty for non-compliance, by whom is it set, and how enforced? Is the proposed enforcement both legal and ethical?

    In the case of “vaccination” (more exactly in the case of — to be exact — injection by hypodermic of a foreign substance into a person’s body), the most important distinction (legally or otherwise) is not between “forced” and “deliberate” but rather between “voluntary” and “involuntary”.

    A person who agrees to be injected even though they hate agreeing to it (but are coerced and agree, for example, out of fear of the loss of their job) is technically submitting voluntarily. In this case they cannot sue if they suffer injury as a result. (Nor can their family sue if they die as a result.) But if a person does not agree to be injected, but is forcibly held down and jabbed, then that is an involuntary injection, and by any reasonable definition it is a crime against that person, and legally and morally indefensible (as was made clear in the Nuremberg Trials).

    So when anyone advocates “mandatory vaccination” we should ask, do they advocate “forced’ or “involuntary” so-called “vaccination” (that is, hypodermic injection). If they do then by any reasonable definition they are advocating the commission of a criminal act. And if that act is part of a general action against a population then it is genocide and a war crime. For which, obviously, there should be consequences.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. That’s exactly the point. Coerced vaccinion means legal liability for those who make it coercive. “Deliberate” vaccination means NO legal liability coz it’s a “deliberate” action and the person who get’s jabbed “deliberate” does it on his or her own responsibility. This rumble (or almost threat) “Mandatory vaccination will come!” is most probably a kind of PsyOp to force as many who were “vaccination hesistant” or “vaccination shy” to their doctors or vaccination centers to get the jab “deliberate”. The fact that this “deliberate” is not “deliberate” at all doesn’t mean a f**** for the strategists of mass vaccination.


  16. (A) Suppose a person is pressured (by some “official health authority”) to receive an mRNA injection (such as what is misleadingly called a “Covid-19 vaccination”).
    (B) Suppose that person is told, or has good reason to believe, that if they do not agree to this then they will suffer severe harmful consequences (for example, social ostracism, loss of job and income, substantial fines, jail time, abduction and incarceration in a concentration camp).
    (C) Suppose that person submits to receiving the injection only because not doing so would result in (to them) unacceptable harm.
    (D) Would that amount to “coercion” by that official health authority?
    (E) If so, and keeping in mind the precedent of the Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal, does this imply that that person’s submission to receiving the injection is “involuntary”?
    (F) If so, does that mean that that official health authority has committed a criminal act (possibly justifying classification as a “war crime”) against that person, or at least an act which by any reasonable standard is unethical?
    (G) If so, does that mean that that the pursuit of criminal or civil penalties (or both) are justified and (in a society which the legal system has not been irreparably corrupted) morally obligatory?

    We need the advice of a civil rights lawyer regarding these questions. If any lawyers are reading this, would they care to respond? If there are none, or they do not care to respond, could some reader forward this to a civil rights lawyer (or to some legal blog) and post their reply?


    1. The Nuremberg Code (formulated in 1947, following the Nuremberg War Crimes Trials) is concerned with what constitute a permissible medical experiment. See

      The first of the eleven articles of the Code states: “The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.”

      Note that Article 1 refers explicitly to coercion. The subject of the experiment (such as anyone among the many millions of people who have received a Covid mRNA injection) should be able to exercise free power of choice, without coercion. A person who submits to receiving a Covid mRNA injection because not doing so would result in (to them) unacceptable harm (as described in my previous comment) has been coerced into submitting.

      Any person, such as an agent of an official health authority, who coerces a person into receiving a Covid mRNA injection is thus guilty of a war crime as stated in the Nuremberg Code. What could be clearer? And that such agents should be prevented from inflicting further harm and should receive appropriate punishment for their actions?

      Any government which condones this war crime is, by that fact, guilty of waging war upon its citizens. Whether its citizens choose to defend themselves (and their loved ones) by fighting back using any means at their disposal (which is their right) is a choice they must make (or not) themselves.


      1. Quoted from

        Prominent [Italian] historian Alessandro Barbero has argued that the [Italian] government should be upfront about what is effectively mandatory vaccination instead of “blackmailing” its citizens. “They say, ‘the vaccine is not mandatory, it’s just that if you don’t have it, you can’t live, you can’t go to work or university.’ …

        Giuseppe Cataldi, a professor of international law at the University of Napoli L’Orientale and a human rights expert said: “If a worker doesn’t want to get vaccinated, and at least formally retains the right to not get vaccinated, but in the end is forced to because he supports his family and cannot spend 10 percent of his salary on tests, that’s not okay.” [“Forced to” = is coerced into receiving the (possibly lethal) jab.]


  17. The vax mandates are another example, not a new one, in a creeping normalcy process. One of their precursors was seat belt laws (others might be laws about obeying traffic lights-signs)…Every time we accept a new law made to “protect us from ourselves” we sacrifice a little more of our individual freedom to the collective, and the collective is ultimately controlled by the elites, financial and/or bureaucratic. The seat belt laws became normal-accepted as being for the “public good” fairly easily as there were not many valid questions, with valid scientific support, as to whether they could in fact cause harm or whether they would be effective. The vax mandates are, thankfully,, not on such an easy path and may yet meet with too much resistance to endure, especially as it becomes increasingly clear and broadly known that the vaxes are not so safe or effective. The seat belt law however is not going away, and who knows what future regulations may come up for proposal as our technologies march along (things to ensure the “public good” like genetic engineering mods to our genome, taking children out of parental custody to ensure they are raised in such a way as to best benefit themselves and society, regs requiring us to own a certain type of car, etc?).

    There’s really nothing new under the sun here…Even people living as H&Gers are socially coerced to follow along with the collective. The thing that is increasing in danger is our level of technology and all the potentials it brings for unintended side effects and needs for new regulations that increasingly borgify-ant-ify-dehumanize us, and the potential of our technological dependency to place us ever deeper in control of those who own and control the tech, a problem not faced by H&Gers with much lower levels of tech. Truth is that this whole covid debacle is the result of the form of the technologies we have adopted-then become dependent upon, and that the virus itself may very well have been created by our latest advances in genetic engineering tech. Our technological dependency is carrying us into totalitarian technocratic control, but we love our tech and aren’t going to just walk away from it any time soon are we?


  18. There are all different things we can do. We are creative beings, and we are all unique. I am now going to link here to a great interview which will show you that there is no evidence of ‘the virus’ whatsoever: Christine Massey reveals to the Health Ranger: Covid-19 “virus” has NEVER been isolated and shown to cause disease And this seems to be so fopr all viruses which would totally undermine The Germ Theory of disease, and Virology!!!
    Their medical model is based on the looking at us as being machines, and they WANT us to believe this materialist myth, and doing so they can sell us the idea we are defunt computers that need constant upgrades. That is basically what they are already doing with their poison shots. One, then double, then booster, then another and another ad nauseum, ad disease, death.
    We can creatively fuck up their darth veda squads. An ex Irish soldier on a video gave a great idea how we can do so. It is simple, simply fill balloons with oil and black paint and launch at these robo-cops and it totally fucks up their visors, weapons, windshields of vehicles. Just one idea!! MAYBE this can be used on their actual robots also. Because I sense their blase attitude making so many people leave their skilled jobs because they will not be experimented on with injected poison is because they think they are eventually replacable with robots!!


    1. Those of us who refuse to submit to the ‘mandatory’ Covid-19 mRNA hypodermic injections can debate this further in the concentration camps (in this project Australia is leading the way).

      For those readers who have not yet seen the following oft-quoted extract from Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn’s novel “The Gulag Archipelago” here it is:

      “And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand?… The [State Security] Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin’s thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt! If…if… We didn’t love freedom enough. And even more – we had no awareness of the real situation…. We purely and simply deserved everything that happened afterward.”


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s